Governments continuously seek to expand their communications surveillance powers. In the 1990s it was in the context of applying telephone surveillance laws to the internet. In the 2000s a spate of new laws arrived in response to 9/11. Expansions were then sought to monitor over-the-top services within the framing of Web 2.0.
Apr 23, 2020 · In a memorandum [PDF] first spotted by The Guardian, the British government is asking that five more public authorities be added to the list of bodies that can access data scooped up under the nation's mass-surveillance laws: the Civil Nuclear Constabulary, the Environment Agency, the Insolvency Service, the UK National Authority for Counter Internet-based monitoring of ILI can capture the trends in case numbers if appropriate weighting is used to correct for differential response. The overall level of incidence is, however, difficult to measure. Internet-based systems may be a useful adjunct to existing ILI surveillance systems as they … Jun 30, 2017 · UK Government warned of ‘serious consequences’ of extreme internet surveillance plans 'It is neither the cause nor the enabler of crime or terrorism' Aatif Sulleyman May 05, 2017 · The UK government is planning to push greater surveillance powers that would force internet providers to monitor communications in near-realtime and install backdoor equipment to break encryption 2. Surveillance does not create a threat of physical harm on its own. When the government is performing surveillance over video, communication lines, and Internet resources, then no one is being physically harmed by these activities. PRISM replaced another mass Internet data mining program, the Terrorist Surveillance Program, which was launched by the US government after the 9/11 terrorist attacks but heavily criticized and considered illegal. Through PRISM, the NSA monitor and collect internet communications from internet service providers using Data Intercept Technology.
Nov 09, 2015
Computer and network surveillance - Wikipedia
Sep 13, 2018 · The UK government’s mass surveillance programme violated human rights and had “no real safeguards”, the European Court of Human Rights (EHCR) has said in a landmark ruling. The Strasbourg
How the UK passed the most invasive surveillance law in